[TramsDownUnder] Re: My first test o

It is a mish-mash of fairly generic information about why trams systems in many places were abandoned, and is only very loosely related to what actually occurred in Sydney, with just enough statements key dates etc to make it seem localised.

This illustrates a major issue with "retail" AIs.... they have access to a huge data sets but are quite poor of assessing the quality of the data, and its evidentiary value in terms of the question asked. 

Cheers,

Bill

On Wednesday, 2 April 2025 at 20:47:24 UTC+11 gr...@hawkmount.com wrote:

Hi group,

I don't post very often but I do read most of the post here. I'm 75 years old fairly computer literate and decided to try AI for the first time this evening and I thought you might be interested.

This was my prompt, just testing it to see what it would do not trying to be significant, but I was very impressed with the result.

"write a short history of why the trams were removed from the streets of Sydney New South Wales in Australia"

This was the response:

The removal of trams from the streets of Sydney, New South Wales, is a story tied to urban development, technological advancements, and shifting transportation priorities. The tram network in Sydney began in the late 19th century, with horse-drawn trams introduced in the 1860s, followed by electric trams in the 1890s. By the early 20th century, Sydney had one of the largest and most extensive tram systems in the world.

However, the decline of the tram network began in the mid-20th century. Several factors contributed to the decision to phase out trams:

1. Rise of the Automobile: After World War II, car ownership surged, and with it, the growing preference for private transportation. The expansion of roads and the increasing availability of cars led to a decline in tram usage.

2. Suburbanization: As Sydney expanded outward, with the development of new suburbs, public transportation systems had to adapt. The tram system, which primarily served the inner city and some nearby areas, became less suited to the needs of a sprawling, car-dominated city.

3. Political and Business Interests: In the 1940s and 1950s, there was strong lobbying from the motor vehicle industry and certain local businesses to replace trams with buses. Buses were seen as more flexible, cheaper to operate, and less reliant on fixed infrastructure like tram tracks. There were also financial pressures and a belief that buses could better meet the growing demands of Sydney's suburban expansion.

4. Costs of Maintenance and Upgrades: Maintaining and upgrading the tram infrastructure was seen as costly, especially when compared to the perceived benefits of buses, which could use existing roads.

The final decision to remove trams was made in the 1950s, and the last tram ran in 1961. The network was replaced with buses, which were seen as more cost-effective and adaptable to the needs of a modern, car-oriented city. Despite this, many people regret the loss of trams, and there have been ongoing discussions about reinstating tram services, with some parts of Sydney now reintroducing light rail systems.

The removal of trams remains a significant moment in the history of Sydney's urban transport and development.

Your thoughts would be very interesting, I'm guessing!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tramsdownunder+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/dcefa404-f2f9-4247-a563-6dd6e6e28cd6n%40googlegroups.com.